Bogus Beauty
Over the years, the perception of beauty has greatly changed for many people. Nowadays, the definition of beauty has shaped itself into a person being flawless from head to toe. Photographers of models and celebrities have started to use technology, such as photo shop, to alter one’s natural beauty from a simplistic retouching of “a stray hair put in place” to an extravagant change of “shedding ten or twenty pounds” off a person’s body! Hany Faird, a computer science professor and a digital forensics expert, says anyone can be made “beautiful” because once you “fix one thing, then another, pretty soon you end up with Barbie,” which goes to show how misleading and immodest these retouched images can appear. These impeccable pictures posted on magazines, television ads and billboards have sparked feminist legislators in Britain, France, and Norway to want digitally altered photos to be labeled because they are adamant to ones self-image and display false views of beauty. Dr. Farid along with a Ph.D student, Eric Kee, in computer science felt so strongly towards the alterations of photos that they are proposing a unique software tool. This software tool will be used for measuring, on a scale of one to five, how much beauty and fashion photos have been altered. This software tool will help separate the real pictures from the digitally edited fake images that are displayed in magazines, billboards and advertisements.
In my opinion, I strongly feel that pictures displayed to the public that have been extremely altered should be labeled. People need to realize that these beautiful pictures, which show models being “perfect,” require extreme measures of editing. Labeling pictures permits the public to understand that an image has been altered and that the person didn’t really look flawless in reality. Many people base how they want to look on these pictures and they will do anything to achieve those looks. Some people have eating disorders because they have a low self esteem looking at these pictures and are willing to risk put their health and safety at risk. Everyone needs to realize that you can be beautiful with the skin your in. Falsity doesn’t make you any different; it only makes you appear different. I don’t see why anyone would feel the need to appear as something they aren’t because all they’re doing is being non-genuine to them selves. I know I’m not perfect. I don’t wear a size zero, my eyes are kind of small, and my nose has a bump on it, but I’m okay with that. For me, it’s the quality of my character that makes a difference. I think celebrity magazines and photo shopped images astray from this crucial point. They misrepresent an ideal figure and the way every person should look. This is why I strongly agree with labeling pictures that have been altered.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/technology/software-to-rate-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched.html?_r=2
LOHR, STEVE. "Software to Rate How Drastically Photos Are Retouched - NYTimes.com." The New York Times - Breaking News, World News & Multimedia. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Dec. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/technology/software-to-rate-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched.html?_r=2>.